Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Orzhov Pixie | rubyxillia | 7-1 | None |
Sultai Midrange | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 28, 2025 |
Mono-Red Aggro | alessandro_cecconi | 9-5 | None |
Izzet Prowess | daniele visintin | 9-5 | None |
Mono Black Demons | strongmind | 6-2 | None |
Izzet Prowess | matteo soldi | 6-2 | None |
Mono-Red Aggro | marco oliveto | 6-7 | None |
Azorius Control , Azorius Omniscience , Dimir Midrange , Goblins , Izzet Cauldron , Izzet Prowess , Mono Black Demons , Mono White Tokens , Mono-Red Aggro , Orzhov Pixie
Faceless Haven ranks #5085 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 99%).
Colorless average: 45.6%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Faceless Haven is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 15.63 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 0 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.0%. Faceless Haven has a win rate of 59.7%, making it 27.0% better than other 0-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Blood on the Snow | Snow Sorcery | 7 | 66.1% | 2 |
Arcane Signet | Artifact | 8 | 64.1% | 2 |
Behold the Multiverse | Instant | 10 | 63.5% | 2 |
Galazeth Prismari | Legendary Creature — Elder Dragon | 6 | 57.7% | 0 |
Murderous Rider | Creature — Zombie Knight | 7 | 56.5% | 1 |
Negate | Instant | 15 | 54.5% | 2 |
Saw It Coming | Instant | 16 | 54.4% | 3 |
Alrund's Epiphany | Sorcery | 9 | 54.0% | 2 |
Shark Typhoon | Enchantment | 10 | 53.3% | 2 |
Essence Scatter | Instant | 8 | 53.0% | 1 |
Cards that perform better with Faceless Haven than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Murderous Rider | Creature — Zombie Knight | 3 | 7 | 77.4% | 60.5% | +16.9% |
Arcane Signet | Artifact | 2 | 6 | 74.2% | 58.7% | +15.5% |
Blood on the Snow | Snow Sorcery | 6 | 6 | 79.4% | 64.0% | +15.4% |
Behold the Multiverse | Instant | 4 | 8 | 73.3% | 60.5% | +12.9% |
Shark Typhoon | Enchantment | 6 | 8 | 67.5% | 58.6% | +8.9% |
Alrund's Epiphany | Sorcery | 7 | 9 | 68.2% | 59.9% | +8.2% |
Saw It Coming | Instant | 3 | 14 | 66.2% | 59.5% | +6.7% |
Galazeth Prismari | Legendary Creature — Elder Dragon | 4 | 6 | 67.6% | 61.7% | +6.0% |
Negate | Instant | 2 | 13 | 63.5% | 58.1% | +5.4% |
Essence Scatter | Instant | 2 | 6 | 63.0% | 60.7% | +2.3% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Mono-Red Aggro | 21 | 4.8% | 26.7% |
Izzet Prowess | 16 | 1.6% | 52.2% |
Dimir Midrange | 5 | 0.2% | 61.9% |
Mono White Tokens | 3 | 0.5% | 50.0% |
Mono Black Demons | 3 | 1.6% | 47.2% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.