Faceless Haven

Top Performing Decklists

Deck Creator Record Best Finish
Orzhov Pixie rubyxillia 7-1 None
Sultai Midrange platinum-mythic rank player 6-0 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 28, 2025
Mono-Red Aggro alessandro_cecconi 9-5 None
Izzet Prowess daniele visintin 9-5 None
Mono Black Demons strongmind 6-2 None
Izzet Prowess matteo soldi 6-2 None
Mono-Red Aggro marco oliveto 6-7 None

Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)

Win Rate Impact
+4.6%
vs average deck
Top Table Win Rate
67.4%
placement-weighted
Meta Trend
+7.0%
recent vs earlier
Sample Size
42
decks
Tournament Results
6
1st place
11
top 8
Average Copies
2.0
per deck

Meta Performance Analysis

Faceless Haven ranks #5085 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 99%).

Game Impact Factor
60.28
How much this card influences game outcomes
Color Differential
+10.24%

Colorless average: 45.6%

Performance compared to other Colorless cards

Based on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Faceless Haven is an underperforming card in the current meta.

Recommended number of copies: 1

Win Rate Timeline

Card Efficiency Analysis

Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
59.7
Win percentage points per mana invested
Relative Efficiency
1.00x
Compared to average cards of same mana value

Performance Efficiency: 15.63 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)

At 0 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.0%. Faceless Haven has a win rate of 59.7%, making it 27.0% better than other 0-mana cards.

Top Performing Partners

Card Name Type Deck Count Win Rate 1st Places
Blood on the Snow Snow Sorcery 7 66.1% 2
Arcane Signet Artifact 8 64.1% 2
Behold the Multiverse Instant 10 63.5% 2
Galazeth Prismari Legendary Creature — Elder Dragon 6 57.7% 0
Murderous Rider Creature — Zombie Knight 7 56.5% 1
Negate Instant 15 54.5% 2
Saw It Coming Instant 16 54.4% 3
Alrund's Epiphany Sorcery 9 54.0% 2
Shark Typhoon Enchantment 10 53.3% 2
Essence Scatter Instant 8 53.0% 1

Card Synergy Analysis

Cards that perform better with Faceless Haven than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.

Card Name Type Mana Decks Win Rate Together Win Rate Apart Synergy Score
Murderous Rider Creature — Zombie Knight 3 7 77.4% 60.5% +16.9%
Arcane Signet Artifact 2 6 74.2% 58.7% +15.5%
Blood on the Snow Snow Sorcery 6 6 79.4% 64.0% +15.4%
Behold the Multiverse Instant 4 8 73.3% 60.5% +12.9%
Shark Typhoon Enchantment 6 8 67.5% 58.6% +8.9%
Alrund's Epiphany Sorcery 7 9 68.2% 59.9% +8.2%
Saw It Coming Instant 3 14 66.2% 59.5% +6.7%
Galazeth Prismari Legendary Creature — Elder Dragon 4 6 67.6% 61.7% +6.0%
Negate Instant 2 13 63.5% 58.1% +5.4%
Essence Scatter Instant 2 6 63.0% 60.7% +2.3%

Top Archetypes

Archetype Deck Count % of Archetype Win Rate
Mono-Red Aggro 21 4.8% 26.7%
Izzet Prowess 16 1.6% 52.2%
Dimir Midrange 5 0.2% 61.9%
Mono White Tokens 3 0.5% 50.0%
Mono Black Demons 3 1.6% 47.2%

Statistics Explanation

Statistic Description Formula
Win Rate Impact How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks)
Top Table Win Rate A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight)
Meta Trend Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period)
Confidence Factor A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). log10(Number of decks + 1)
Average Copies The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks)
Card Synergy Score Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates)
Raw Efficiency Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. (Win rate) / (Mana value)
Relative Efficiency How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value)
Performance Efficiency Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value)
Game Impact Factor A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100)
Color Differential How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. Win rate - Average win rate for same color

All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.